“The lack of supposed trickle-down benefits for industrialization to reduce income inequality during China’s 30 years of post-reform economic growth appears to constitute an anomaly for the inverted U-shaped Kuznets curve hypothesis. Using an alternative inequality measure that depends on factor share and ownership, we show that in a transition economy with the state weight of capital less than its market counterpart, enhanced state ownership exacerbates inequality. Econometric evidence suggests that although the government attempts to balance the three goals of growth, equality, and state ownership in the short run, stubborn state ownership as well as lopsided growth patterns jeopardize equality in the long run and have therefore delayed the turning point in the inverted U-shaped Kuznets curve for China.”
@mattyglesias @Noahpinion and that means the left wants high housing costs, because to argue otherwise is just no true scotsman. 7 hours ago
@mattyglesias isn't it embarrassing that the popular left blames corporations for housing costs? That discredits everyone on the left, right 7 hours ago
